Is Powder Metallurgy Right for Your Part?
August 18, 2024 · 4 min read
PM can slash your per-unit costs — or it can be an expensive mistake. The difference comes down to two criteria. If your part meets both, PM is likely your best option. If it doesn't, look elsewhere.
Criterion 1: Geometric Simplicity
PM parts are shaped by molds. That makes the process ideal for components with strong symmetry, simple profiles, and minimal structural layers. Classic PM parts include:
- Gears and sprockets
- Oil pump rotors
- Valve guides and bushings
- Structural brackets and spacers
- Lock mechanisms and cam profiles
If your part has complex multi-level geometry, undercuts, or features that require extensive secondary machining, PM's cost advantage erodes quickly.
Criterion 2: Volume
PM tooling represents a real upfront investment. The economics only work at scale:
Larger parts: MOQ typically 5,000+ pieces
Smaller parts: MOQ typically 10,000+ pieces
At these volumes, PM starts to make a lot of sense: fast production cycles, good part-to-part consistency, near-zero material waste, and lower energy consumption than machining.
The Quick Decision Matrix
✅ Simple geometry + High volume → PM is likely optimal
⚠️ Simple geometry + Low volume → Run the cost math — may or may not work
⚠️ Complex geometry + High volume → Consider die casting or investment casting
❌ Complex geometry + Low volume → CNC machining is probably better
Not Sure? Send Us the Drawing.
Our engineers evaluate PM feasibility for free — including process comparison against CNC, casting, and forging. Get a free assessment →